Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Republicans Push Sovereign Immunity for Private Companies

This blog is the second on recent efforts by Republican legislators with the consequence of making Florida’s roads and highways more dangerous. (The first blog: Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Republican Legislators Work to Make Florida’s Roadways Less Safe.)

Section 768.28(5)(a), Florida Statutes limits the recovery against the state and its agencies and subdivisions for tort lawsuits to $200,000 per individual claim and $300,000 total for all claims arising out of the same incident or occurrence.

No matter how catastrophic and life-altering the injuries may be or whether death results from the negligence of the sovereign, this is the hard cap.
It does not matter what a judge or jury decides regarding the extent of the damages.

Section 768.28(5)(a) is the outgrowth of section 768.28(1), which is a limited waiver by the state of the doctrine commonly referred to as “Sovereign Immunity.” The doctrine is derived from English common law under which the King could not be sued on the theories that he could do no wrong, and that there could be no legal rights against the authority that makes the laws upon which the rights depend. See Miles McCann, Visiting Fellow, National Association of Attorneys General, State Sovereign Immunity, Nov. 11, 2017, https://www.naag.org/attorney-general-journal/state-sovereign-immunity/(last visited Jan. 23, 2024).

In Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 728 (1999), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the doctrine was adopted by our country’s Founders in the Constitution itself rather than the Eleventh Amendment, solidifying its place in American jurisprudence. The doctrine is available to the federal government and every state.

Not every state chooses to hide behind sovereign immunity. California and New York, states with large populations and high costs of living and medical care like Florida, have no caps on suits against their state and local governments. Among the states using cap limits, Florida’s numbers are some of the lowest, making them a mere slap on the wrist to wrongdoers and failing to encourage safer practices and procedures.

The Florida Department of Transporation (FDOT) enters into contracts with private companies on many of its projects.  The contracts require a degree of vetting to determine competence and allow for oversight by the sovereign. 768.25(5) extends the sovereign caps to these companies while performing under FDOT contracts, providing a measure of insulation not otherwise available to them on private projects. So, for example, the negligence of one of these companies on a private project resulting in catastrophic injuries could lead to a final judgment against the company for millions of dollars, whereas the same facts on a sovereign project would be limited to a $200,000 (per person) final judgment.

For two months every year, Florida’s senators and representatives meet in Tallahassee to create new laws. This year, bills were offered to extend the sovereign caps to companies that were not in privity of contract with the governmental entities. As such, they would not be vetted for competence by the sovereign or be subject to the sovereign’s scrutiny.

This is a recipe for an increase in dangerous conditions. Under no circumstances would the arrangement promote safety.

Thankfully, due to the hard work of the staff and members of the Florida Justice Association (FJA), the worst aspects of the proposed bills were eliminated or watered down.

All of the dangerous bills were proposed by Republicans.

Elections matter.

********************